Smarter Andrew Sullivan

Oh, for Christ’s sake, enough with the Howell Raines stuff already.

Face it, Andy, you were fired.

You lost your job.

You were canned.

You were pink-slipped.

You fucked up.

The Times dumped your ass.

They said, “Sayonara, baby!”

They gave you the old “Heave ho!”

You were fired because your writing sucks and, yes, probably because you took a little too much joy from criticizing the house. Nothing wrong with that, something you may learn now that you’re actually an employer (of sorts, and no, editing the New Republic doesn’t count, because we all know about Martin Peretz).

So quit with the I’m-so-principled act and DEAL WITH IT!

Andy can be hilarious, especially when he doesn’t intend to be.

Here’s the world’s most comical gay “pundit” writing today about the world’s most eloquent gay journalist:

“SIGNORILE MAKES SENSE: Yes, it can happen. He makes some decent points in this piece about the AIDS death of Herb Ritts and the new silence surrounding the epidemic.”

The reference, in case you missed Andy’s (“Signorile”) or mine (“the world’s most eloquent gay journalist”), is to Michelangelo Signorile and his latest column in Newsday, “Don’t Hide the Truth About AIDS.”

Give it up, Andy. Mike is so far out of your league it’s not even funny.

It’s Friday, and regular readers know what that means: It’s the day Andy picks up his weekly check courtesy of Sung Myung Moon, head of the Unification “Church.”

In return, the Washington Times gets to recycle The Daily Dish, recast in the form of The Weekly Dish.

Still no mention of this bizarre gig over at Andy’s vanity site.

But Why Do Anti-Intellectuals Love the Right?

Andrew Sullivan, who yanked some parchment from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, today cites a piece from Robert Nozick on why intellectuals have long displayed a greater affinity with the left than with the right.

Don’t bother. Neither Nozick nor Sullivan has anything to say that we haven’t read since the subject emerged amid the birth of modernism. (Makes me wonder whether Sullivan reads anything other than Paul Krugman these days.)

Of course, the question Sullivan doesn’t ask, perhaps because it hits just a little too close to home, is why anti-intellectuals love the right wing and why the right wing is just fine with that, thank you very much.

The Monoligual Sullivan

I can’t help but wonder who helped Andy by translating the Der Spiegel interview with New York Times columnist Paul Krugman. (See Andy’s January 3 piece, “A New Marcos.”)

To the best of my knowledge, Andy neither speaks nor reads any language other than English, standards for earning a Harvard Ph.D. having come down substantially in recent decades, and the Brits having a longstanding aversion to learning anything other than the mother tongue.

If that’s the case, shouldn’t he give credit where credit is due?

Makes me wonder: Is the Republican National Committee sending around strategic translations?

andrewsullivan.com: Not a Professional Enterprise

In a December 9 post, “Pledge Week Update,” Andy said, “Our goal was to have a core supporting readership of around 5,000 or more. If we get that, we can make this a professional enterprise, pay our expenses, hire an intern, and pay me a real salary.”

Today, in a post called “The Results,” Andy says he received “payments” from 3,339 people.

Since Andy fell 33% shy of his stated goal, I guess that means andrewsullivan.com is still not “a professional enterprise.”

Quod erat demonstrandum.

P.S.: Massachusetts tax authorities: Please take appropriate notice.

Who’s Not a Republican?

Is it just me or does Andy seem to be expressing lament in Wednesday’s post, “Don’t Miss,” about Senator Trent Lott (R-Miss.)?

Andy writes, “He’s now more than embarrassment. He’s an obstacle to the Republican future.”

So is that a good thing or a bad thing?

If Andy is, as he protests, not a Republican and never could be, is this cause for rejoicing or sorrow? The tone of The Daily Dish lately would suggest the latter.

The question then becomes, Why?

Still Taking Moonie Money

I neglected to post the link to Andy’s regular Friday feature in The Washington Times because I assumed the latest round of disclosures concerning the loonies who dot the upper reaches of the paper’s masthead--exposed by Michelangelo Signorile in the New York Press: “That Other Times”--would have shamed Andy into severing the relationship.

Not so. Andy’s column appeared on Friday as usual, and you can find it here: “The Weekly Dish.”

So Andy’s still taking Moonie money.